Posted on July 15, 2010
by dancingczars.com
by dancingczars.com
This post is a little old, sorry about that, but the comments at the bottom of the article, impress with their anger, and, as the saying goes, "A word, to the wise (listen up, Obama) is sufficient."
rng
As far as my interest in the removal of Obama is concerned, they
rest on two issues: 1) the Health care bill, and 2) border/ immigration.
These two issues are easy to understand and simple to
explain and agree on decisive action. The second issue,
immigration, is addressed below. Mr. Brown states his case clearly
and provides powerful evidence worthy of action by our congress.
---lee
Walter Brown
Patriot Word
If you thought yesterday’s news was bad, you’re not going to like
this: The federal government is obligated under the constitution to
protect the states from foreign invasion, failure to secure the
borders is negligence relative to this requirement. The president
has taken an oath (legally binding with legal consequences for
violation) to uphold and defend the Constitution, this obligates him
legally to perform duties described therein. He has failed to
perform or even attempt to perform his duties, this is dereliction
of duty.
Now he has directed the DOJ to challenge enforcement of Federal Laws
protecting the States against foreign invasion, this action directly
and intentionally undermines the United States Constitution. This
is treason against the United States Constitution.
Obama Orders DOJ To Challenge Ariz. Immigration LawShare.. Yesterday
at 11:46am The ink is barely dry on Arizona’s new immigration control law and
President Obama has already threatened to take legal action against
the measure even though it was adopted from the federal statute
that’s rarely enforced.
Amid huge protests and cries of racism from the open-borders
movement, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed the law
Obama, who tried pressuring Brewer into vetoing the “misguided” law,
assures that it threatens civil rights and undermines basic notions
of fairness and trust between police and their communities. The
commander-in-chief has ordered the Department of Justice to
challenge its legality and vows to “closely monitor the situation”
and examine the legislation’s civil rights implications.
As far as my interest in the removal of Obama is concerned, they
rest on two issues: 1) the Health care bill, and 2) border/ immigration.
These two issues are easy to understand and simple to
explain and agree on decisive action. The second issue,
immigration, is addressed below. Mr. Brown states his case clearly
and provides powerful evidence worthy of action by our congress.
---lee
Walter Brown
Patriot Word
If you thought yesterday’s news was bad, you’re not going to like
this: The federal government is obligated under the constitution to
protect the states from foreign invasion, failure to secure the
borders is negligence relative to this requirement. The president
has taken an oath (legally binding with legal consequences for
violation) to uphold and defend the Constitution, this obligates him
legally to perform duties described therein. He has failed to
perform or even attempt to perform his duties, this is dereliction
of duty.
Now he has directed the DOJ to challenge enforcement of Federal Laws
protecting the States against foreign invasion, this action directly
and intentionally undermines the United States Constitution. This
is treason against the United States Constitution.
Obama Orders DOJ To Challenge Ariz. Immigration LawShare.. Yesterday
at 11:46am The ink is barely dry on Arizona’s new immigration control law and
President Obama has already threatened to take legal action against
the measure even though it was adopted from the federal statute
that’s rarely enforced.
Amid huge protests and cries of racism from the open-borders
movement, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed the law
Obama, who tried pressuring Brewer into vetoing the “misguided” law,
assures that it threatens civil rights and undermines basic notions
of fairness and trust between police and their communities. The
commander-in-chief has ordered the Department of Justice to
challenge its legality and vows to “closely monitor the situation”
and examine the legislation’s civil rights implications.
to read the complete article
http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2010/07/15/obamas-predicament-has
-transitioned-from-dereliction-of-duty-to-treason/
http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2010/07/15/obamas-predicament-has
-transitioned-from-dereliction-of-duty-to-treason/
No comments:
Post a Comment